Search:
Home
About Us
Advisors
Radio Interviews
Radio Archives
Radio Panel
Blog
Articles
Radio Topics
Radio Guests
Resources
Member Discounts
Press Releases
Press Pass
Useful Links
Contact Us
Membership Info
Members Area
Garrison Challenge
Garrison Report
 

New Construction Strategies
(800) 861-0874

Questions?
Comments?
E-mail
Ted Garrison, Your NCS Radio Host

NEW CONSTRUCTION STRATEGIES ARTICLES
Southeast Construction Magazine: July 2004 Issue
Innovation: The Path to Greater Profits - Part 1
By Ted Garrison
The terms “project management” and “project manager”both do a poor job of conveying the responsibilities inherent in the role of running a project. Instead, the terms “project leadership” and “project leader” would better describe the responsibilities necessary to deliver a project on time, on budget, with high performance and with a delighted client.

While titles are often meaningless, in this case I believe they indicate a difference in thinking. For example, most books and programs on project management focus on how to run projects. In contrast, leadership focuses on what needs to be done. The most important question for success is “what must be done?”

I often ask my audiences, “What is more important— to do the ‘right thing’ or do ‘things right’?” This may seem logical because we have been taught in school that the students that do things rightare rewarded. Unfortunately, if the task doesn’t need to be performed does it really matter how well it was done?

Therefore, it’s critical to first identify the tasks that must be performed—the “what;” then learn how to master the what, or in essence learn how to do the what correctly. Unfortunately, most project management books and programs focus on the how and not on the what. This is due in part to the fact that too many of these programs or books are designed by technocrats who believe the process is what is important.

In contrast, a leader focuses on results. The leader understands people are only paid for results. No one cares how hard you work if you don’t get the desired results, no one cares how smart you are if you don’t get the results. Get the results and you are the hero.

This doesn’t mean that we can sacrifice safety, legality, morality, or ethics in order to achieve the results. What’s being discussed is the ability to adapt or change business practices and process in order to improve results.

If there is any doubt in your mind about the importance of leadership, consider the following situation. Imagine you have two projects. The first has a great schedule, great budget, a great set of plans and specs—and a complete jerk running the project. The second has a terrible schedule, a terrible budget, a messed-up set of plans and specs, but a true leader running it. Which project do you think will turn out better? I have asked that question many times and so far everyone has picked the second project. Yes, leadership makes a difference.

I’m not suggesting that project management tools aren’t valuable. They can certainly make the job easier. However, the tools don’t build the project, people build them, therefore people skills are the most important project management tool.

Despite this reality, more and more organizations seem to focus on increasing technical competence by adding additional controls and complexity. For example, project schedules have continued to grow in complexity until they are virtually useless for the intended purpose. The schedules are so complicated they are difficult to understand; they take too many hours to create and cause a constant drain on management’s time to update them. Despite the extra work and complexity there has been no improvement in project scheduling performance.

The leader understands that his or her role is not to tell everyone how to do his or her job. Instead, it’s the leader responsibility to insure the person assigned to the task is qualified, the person understand the problem and the desired results, has the necessary resources and is committed. With this accomplished they get out of the way.

The leader’s approach results in a work force that is highly motivated and high performing. In essence, results are number one, not control or the process.
* * * * * THE END * * * * *

Ted Garrison, the author ofStrategic Planning for Contractors, works with businesses in the construction industry. He can be reached at Growing@TedGarrison.com

<<< Back to Previous Page



NewConstruction Strategies | 1092 Hampstead Lane, Ormond Beach, FL 32174 | Ph: (800) 861-0874 |

© 2007 New Construction Strategies